Episode #21

Group What Groupware


Jack goes over Ruby gems and Nextcloud, while Andrew takes a closer look at why it's necessary to care about other people's feelings.

Intro

The NEW Match-Case Statement in Python 3.10

Be More Realistic About the Time You Have

FreeBSD 13’s Close Call

News / Community Updates

Ruby off the Rails

Releases

OurCompose Developments

Q1 Wrapup

Integration Discussion - Nextcloud - Groupware

Grab Bag - Primal Leadership

Learning to Lead With Emotional Intelligence

Summaries:

Heather Farran’s Write-up and Evaluation

“the fundamental task of leaders is to prime good feeling in those they lead. That occurs when a leader creates resonance; a reservoir of positivity that frees the best in people. At its root, then, the primal job of leadership is emotional.

The Power Moves

In Primal Leadership (2001) Daniel Goleman argues that the number one trait of any good leader is his emotional intelligence, and his ability to connect and engage with his followers. The book is also famous for Goleman’s six types of leaders, whom he describes in detail.

Leadership Types

Daniel Goleman uses the term “resonant leaders” to describe leaders who understand human nature and leverage their emotional intelligence to connect with people and get the most out of them.

Resonant leaders embrace emotions and humanity.

Dissonant leaders instead don’t understand or actively try to cut out the human side of business.

The Power Moves

Resonant

Dissonant

Andrew’s Emotional Intelligence Domains Takeaways

Social Awareness - Service

How we rollout change is just as important as the quality/excellence of the tool. This is because people’s emotions have a greater effect on the success of a rollout than people’s intellect

To quote Jack from the fifth episode of the podcast:

What’s a tool if you hate it? You’re not gunna sign into Kanboard if you hate it!

This is more important than ever when adopting new tooling and changing the day-to-day functions of an organization, no matter how small it is!!!

When someone considers their task as completed, but to your point of view, it’s only 1/5 completed, then you have a problem. Some recent examples:

This is in no small part a lack of setting expectations. Using Kanboard, you can do this using the description field of a task.

This can also come back to the three components of motivation:

Relationship Management - Everything

In response to “It’s like a physical tick for me to be unable to lie”:

Sometimes things need to be said in a diplomatic way, and not just… bleh, you know?

[…]

How do you decide, or do you decide how this is going to make this person feel.

[…]

If I heard “There’s probably some misunderstanding between us. Let me be as clear and precise as possible to clear away that misunderstanding”, I would be like, ooh… too clear.

Just Chatting on Twitch

People need to feel heard. They need to not feel this is just another top down thing. To get buy-in, people love to interact with ideas before it is set in stone. This will make them feel heard and valued. It will also allow us to gain valuable insights into potential misunderstandings before an official rollout. Finally, by drawing them into the process before completion they will feel an ownership of it because they touched it before it was finalized. (This remains true even if the tool is 99.9% complete.) Without buy-in, you are trying to lead people where they don’t want to go. Taking time to get buy-in is like taking time to show people a travel brochure and letting people get excited about the journey. If the goal is buyin, the extra time it takes is worth the years of positive movement. When it comes to change, efficient is not always effective. Heather Farran’s Write-up and Evaluation

Historically, RMS has been expressing his views in ways that upset many people. He is usually more focused on the philosophical underpinnings, and pursuing the objective truth and linguistic purism, while underemphasising people’s feelings on matters he’s commenting on. This makes his arguments vulnerable to misunderstanding and misrepresentation, something which we feel is happening in the open letter calling for his removal. His words need to be interpreted in this context and taking into account that more often than not, he is not looking to put things diplomatically.

An Open Letter in Support of Richard M. Stallman


The tools we use to get it done

At Compositional Enterprises, we value our time as much as you do. That's why we only use the best Free, Libre, and Open Source tools to produce our quality content and products.

Take action and start using the same secure and convenient tools that we use by signing up for your OurCompose instance today! Invest in your community by donating directly to the podcast! Every bit (and byte) goes back into growing and spreading the show. Otherwise, to stay updated with the show and all future developments, find us on reddit or sign up for our mailing list using the form below!